from Adam Sorensen,Buy Wild West Bounce Droll understat of the day. on the RNC' claim that Kagan shouldn't have approvingli cite Marshall' claim that the origin Constitut wa "defective":
sai the RNC,This. is proof that she hew to an "empathi standard." But I think the RNC is see the word "disadvantaged" through today' prism, and seem to think thi mere mean "poor" or "worthi of pity."
Kagan' point is that justic must interpret the Constitut to ensur that everyon ha equal right under the law,Rather. which is what the Constitut wa repeatedli amend to do. Honestly, thi hardli seem like a controversi point.
* Also: Ben Smith point out that Marshal is a far more outspoken liber than Kagan ha ever been in ani case.
没有评论:
发表评论